Vol. I · May 2026
put a ring on it
An editorial on the small, circular things we keep
Journal/Article

Can men wear engagement rings?

Men can wear engagement rings. I've made 23 of them in the last four years, and every single one was the right call for the client. The only people who...

Men can wear engagement rings. I've made 23 of them in the last four years, and every single one was the right call for the client. The only people who think this is a strange question are usually the ones who haven't had to answer it yet.

Last June a man named Sam walked in with a 0.42 carat oval diamond that belonged to his grandfather. Sam wanted an engagement ring for himself, not a rehomed heirloom band, and his partner was fully on board. His mother was another story. She kept asking why he'd wear a ring before the wedding, and Sam kept saying, "Because I'm engaged now." That's the whole argument, really. Engagement is a status, not a gender. You don't need a law degree to wear a ring that says you've made a promise.

Yes, men can wear engagement rings

Most men who come in asking for an engagement ring don't want a solitaire. Some do, and I'll make it. But the majority want a band with a stone set into it, or a wide ring with a stone flush-set, something that reads as a wedding band with a tiny point of light. For that, I typically start at 5mm or 6mm in width. A 2mm band with a prong-set diamond looks like it belongs on a different hand.

For metal, 18k yellow is usually my pick for a man's engagement ring. It's warm without being flashy, and it ages into a soft patina that 14k doesn't quite match. If Sam or anyone else wants white, I'll steer toward 18k white with rhodium rather than platinum, mostly because platinum deforms before it abrades and men are hard on rings. For a ring that's going to be worn every day from the day he proposes through the wedding and then for the next fifty years, 18k white holds its shape better in prong work, and I'd rather schedule a rhodium refresh every 18 months than watch platinum deform around a stone. If the client insists on platinum, fine. I set it. But I'll fight for 18k white first.

For the stone, smaller is better. A 0.30 to 0.50 carat diamond, gypsy-set or bezel-set, sits low and won't catch on a deadlift bar. I did a 0.31 carat old European cut in a gypsy setting for a client named Daniel last spring. The first wax came back from the caster too polished, like a mirror finish on a crowbar, and Daniel hated it. We took the surface down to a brushed matte with a satin center and polished edges, and that was the ring. He wore it to his engagement party and never took it off.

One warning: don't put a man's engagement ring in tungsten or titanium if there's any chance his finger size changes. Tungsten cannot be resized, only replaced. I've had three men in the last two years come in with tungsten engagement rings that were half a size too small after weight change, and there was nothing to do but order a new ring and reuse the stone, which is a bad feeling for a ring that's supposed to mark a promise. Stick with gold or platinum if you want the ring to last through life's fluctuations.

There's no industry rule against men wearing engagement rings. The trade never actually banned it. What happened is the 20th century marketed engagement rings hard to women, and the menswear side of the jewelry business never bothered to build the equivalent. So most jewelers don't stock them, and when a man asks, he gets shown a plain band and told to wait for the wedding. That's lazy. A custom jeweler can make an engagement ring for a man in about six to eight weeks, same timeline as any other custom piece, and the cost is usually between $900 and $2,400 for a simple 18k band with a small stone. Not nothing. Not unreasonable.

A ring doesn't care what's in your pants. The metal doesn't know if you're the bride or the groom. I've never once seen a jeweler's saw refuse to cut gold because the intended finger belonged to a man, so the whole debate has always struck me as a little absurd. If a man wants to wear an engagement ring, he should. If his partner doesn't want him to, that's a conversation for the two of them, not a jewelry problem. GIA reports don't have a box for "intended wearer," and the diamond doesn't care.

What I'd wear

If I were getting engaged tomorrow and I wanted a ring, I'd make myself a 5.5mm half-round 18k yellow band with a 0.40 carat old European cut set low in a full bezel, brushed all over except the bezel, which would be polished. That's the ring. No prongs, no pave, no hidden halo. Just a warm wide band with one small old European stone that glows in low light. It wouldn't look like a woman's ring. It wouldn't look like a man's ring. It would look like mine.

Men can wear engagement rings. The better question is what yours should look like. I've made 23 of them. The last one went out to a man named Ben who emailed me a photo of the ring next to his coffee at 7:10 the next morning. That's all I need.

Written by
Renee Alexander
Continue Reading

What is a promise ring versus an engagement ring?

Last spring a client named Marco came in with a $900 budget and no stone. He wanted a promise ring for his girlfriend Priya. The first sketch he pointed to...